<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pitchfork&#8217;s top 200 songs of the 60s&#8211;mp3 downloads</title>
	<atom:link href="/2006/08/pitchforks-top-200-songs-of-60s-mp3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sneakmove.com/2006/08/pitchforks-top-200-songs-of-60s-mp3/</link>
	<description>the sweet sounds of the universe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:14:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://sneakmove.com/2006/08/pitchforks-top-200-songs-of-60s-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sneakmove.com/wp/?p=1545#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>Great link guys but how come they didn&#039;t put even just ONE Doors song on the list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great link guys but how come they didn&#8217;t put even just ONE Doors song on the list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://sneakmove.com/2006/08/pitchforks-top-200-songs-of-60s-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sneakmove.com/wp/?p=1545#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>this one seems to be cleaner and easier to download from (although on one of them I had to try twice for a free &quot;slot&quot; to get it--it seems to work best if you click the link immediately after the 60 second wait period). &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://avec.teamforce.org/2006/08/24/pitchfork-top-200-of-the-60s/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;maybe someone will make a torrent file for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this one seems to be cleaner and easier to download from (although on one of them I had to try twice for a free &#8220;slot&#8221; to get it&#8211;it seems to work best if you click the link immediately after the 60 second wait period). <a href="http://avec.teamforce.org/2006/08/24/pitchfork-top-200-of-the-60s/" >http://avec.teamforce.org/2006/08/24/pitchfork-top-200-of-the-60s/</a>maybe someone will make a torrent file for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://sneakmove.com/2006/08/pitchforks-top-200-songs-of-60s-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sneakmove.com/wp/?p=1545#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>most Pitchfork writers are in their mid-20s to early 30s. I think there is one college-age kid on staff.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;p.s. we couldn&#039;t post mp3s because, y&#039;know, we&#039;d get sued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most Pitchfork writers are in their mid-20s to early 30s. I think there is one college-age kid on staff.p.s. we couldn&#8217;t post mp3s because, y&#8217;know, we&#8217;d get sued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam biguity</title>
		<link>https://sneakmove.com/2006/08/pitchforks-top-200-songs-of-60s-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>sam biguity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sneakmove.com/wp/?p=1545#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>Great link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
